Glasgow's Slavery Legacy

A Statement on Glasgow's Slavery Legacy from Council Leader Susan Aitken.


Susan Aitken


In 2019, Glasgow City Council commissioned the University of Glasgow to carry out audit of Glasgow's connections to the transatlantic slave trade.  Dr Mullen's report provides the most in-depth picture to date, of Glasgow's role in the enslavement of people and the benefits the city accrued from trades built on their trafficking and labour. We have long been aware of the association of many of our street names with that past, but this study allows us to understand just how far and deep the slave economy money went and how many people and organisations were involved in that, including Glasgow City Council's own ancestor organisation. The report reveals the money trail; how the tentacles of the slave economy reached far into Glasgow and helped build and shape this city. It also talks about the legacy of enslavement in the form of institutionalised racism in today's Glasgow.

And this must be publicly acknowledged. We need to be honest about Glasgow's history, our involvement in the slave economy, the attempt at creating a Scottish empire and our deep role in the British Empire.  There are people who live every day with the legacy of their ancestors having been enslaved.  We need to step up and apologise, to express contrition and sorrow for our part in the moral atrocity of slavery.


Following May's local elections, the Slavery Legacy Working Group will start a conversation based on recommendations from the report. Glasgow's BAME organisations provide us with the necessary continuity required to address the issues and questions the report raises. How do we respond to streets and monuments dedicated to people, or the very significant number of high-profile men, who owned or trafficked enslaved people? The discovery that a forerunner to the City Council had investments in the Company of Scotland worth hundreds of millions of pounds in today's money, and that more than 40 Lord Provosts benefitted financially, is new and significant. How do we reckon with these legacies?  Another question we must ask ourselves is what permanent reminder should Glasgow create to recognise our role in this history?

These questions and others will form part of a wide-ranging public conversation about the report, our legacy, and our response to it.   

More details about the work of the Group and its members can be found via the links below.

Last modified on 27 November 2023

Share this page

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share by email

Print

Print this page